Tuesday, March 27, 2007
Playing Into the Sterotype
William Gibson has taken the easy way out with All Tomorrow’s Parties. He has played perfectly into the stereotypical science fiction novel, which must have been simple, techno geek that he is. So, he likes technology—we could probably go so far as to say that he’s obsessed with it. So why then, is All Tomorrow’s Parties written with a obsessively pessimistic outlook on this technology that he supposedly loves and respects? If he loves technology, where does he get this dystopia of what we are going to become from? While he is playing into this stereotypical sci-fi genre, he’s taking the simple route, the one where humanity falls into chaos. When he created Rei Toei, he played on the innate desire of humanity for perfection, but in doing so, he unintentionally implied that humanity in its natural state, with its imperfections, is useless. And, while we are in pursuit of this perfection, we are destroying ourselves. Gibson isn’t challenging himself by stepping off the beaten path and finding the potential happy balance between nature and technology. We don’t need another sinister, chaotic portrayal of where the world is headed, with technology at the helm. What does it do for us, make us feel depressed when we read a very feasible scenario for our planet? That’s how I felt when I read this novel. What’s the point? Instead, lets see a scenario where there is a natural balance between the preoccupation with achieving perfection, and the appreciation of things that aren’t perfect, but are instead original and beautiful that way. Show us how to achieve that, a feasible utopia, and then I will be impressed. I don’t want an unoriginal novel, full of unoriginal, copied gadgets; I want something new, something inspiring- I want something more.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Those are some strong words, my friend. I didn't particularily enjoy Gibson's novel, but I wouldn't say he took the easy route, as you say. It's a very layered, symbolic, complex novel. Also, I don't feel he's criticizing technology, but other aspects of our society. It is a dark novel at times, certainly, but in the end there is hope, I think; did you really find it depressing?
Kudos, regardless, for your bold statements.
Yes, I did, I mean, not one-hundred percent of the time, but I never looked forward to picking it up and continuing reading. I could just leave it that it's not really my cup of tea. The lectures have definitely helped me work through it, but it hasn't been one of the more enjoyable experiences I've ever had.
PS. there should be another 'e' in stereotype in the title...
I think the reason why it's so depressing is that Gibson is a writer from the 80's that really never got out of that era. That was the time when the internet was really starting to become popular and people were becoming disillusioned with the world. Commercialism, corporations and pollution were becoming hot-topic for that era.
this blog is lame
Post a Comment